Cablevision Not Murdoch’s Only Problem

Cablevision’s battle with NewsCorp over retransmission fees is not Rupert Murdoch’s only regulatory problem at the moment. Leo Porter began his post titled “Why the Web Mustn’t Become the New TV” with the news that “A consortium of rivals are gathering to impede media tycoon Rupert Murdoch’s bid to gain total control of [British] cable outlet BSkyB.”

The anti-Murdoch consortium wrote to the British government last week saying “We believe that the proposed takeover could have serious and far-reaching consequences for media plurality.” Besides a group of UK newspaper publishers, the letter was also signed by executives of the BBC and BT, the UK’s biggest telephone company.

Smaller Cable Nets Squeezed Out?

An interesting post from NewTeeVee on how smaller cable networks may be forced off systems as they devote more money and bandwidth to the bigfoot “must carry” networks such as those from Disney, NBCU, TimeWarner and Discovery. The post discusses how AT&T U-verse let its contract with Crown Media to lapse on September 1st.

Disney and NBCU are a double threat as they also own over-the-air stations that are must-carry as per FCC regulations.

FCC Media Ownership Rules

The FCC is about to start the process of rewriting the media ownership
rules again. One of my media friends e-mailed me about a campaign run by hearusnow.org, a project of consumers Union. They are urging the public to send a form letter to the FCC and the White House. I can’t stand e-mailing form
letters, so I worte an e-mail of my own. Not exactly my best writing:

“Originally contained in public utility law, the phrase “public
interest, convenience and necessity” was incorporated into the Radio Act
of 1927 and the Communications Act of 1934.

I do not think that the ownership of massive amounts of radio
stations by group owners such as Infinity and Clear Channel is in the
‘public interest’. This is especially true in the case of Clear Channel,
which also owns SFX Entertainment – a talent representative and major
national concert promoter. Companies such as Infinity and Clear Channel
now hove far too much control in what we hear on the radio and (if
you’re a rock fan) what concerts we can see in our local venues. It also
amazes me that here in the New York City area, both all-news radio
stations are owned by Infinity. So much for diverse voices !

The same problems now exist to a lesser extent with television
networks as well. The ownership cap has snuck up from 25% to 35% to 39%.

The large radio and television station groups are all doing well
financially. Let’s not make it easy for them to buy up all of our
country’s large, profitable stations, leaving the Mom and Pop ‘runt of
the litter’ stations to go bankrupt and have their liceneses bought by
group owners who will pipe in programming by satellite and have no local
presence.

Yes, owners should be allowed to make a profit. But the
Communications Act says “public interest” not private interest. You have
a chance to preserve the freedom of speech and the diversity of opinions
that keep our counrty great and free. Yes, anyone can buy a printing
press or start a blog, but not everyone can have a radio or television
station. Until over-the-air broadcasting goes away completely, you have
an obligation to multiply the voices heard and seen on our nations
licensed frequencies.”